In this post I will attempt to analyse the Year 7 History unit I introduced in my last post against the various theories and concepts I have covered in my course so far. I will then offer recommendations on how to improve the inquiry journey for students studying this unit in the future.
A quick note on the History unit presented. I have chosen to look at this unit as a whole instead of the three individual parts as most might choose to (as shown below). The idea of structuring three depth studies with a varying degree of assistance from the teacher shows the gradual release of responsibility from the teacher to the student, in keeping with the notion of Scaffolding students' learning. Taking each unit as an independent sequence would limit the view of the inquiry learning journey undertaken by the students.
![]() | |
|
Analysis against Theories & Concepts
The Year 7 History unit has been written to meet the Australian Curriculum focus skills of Historical knowledge & understanding and Historical skills at the Year 7 level and aims to address the Key Inquiry Questions set at this level as:
The unit progresses from teacher directed instruction of explicit skills through the lens of Ancient Australia to a guided inquiry into Ancient Egypt before culminating in an open inquiry (students choose an appropriate guiding inquiry question) about either Ancient China or Ancient India. This is an example of a Coupled Inquiry (defined as progression from teacher guided to student guided).
- How do we know about the ancient past?
- Why and where did the earliest societies develop?
- What emerged as the defining characteristics of ancient societies
- What have been the legacies of ancient societies?
The unit progresses from teacher directed instruction of explicit skills through the lens of Ancient Australia to a guided inquiry into Ancient Egypt before culminating in an open inquiry (students choose an appropriate guiding inquiry question) about either Ancient China or Ancient India. This is an example of a Coupled Inquiry (defined as progression from teacher guided to student guided).
Intertwined throughout the whole unit are the various progressions of Bloom's Taxonomy.
Students are asked to:
The explicit teaching of Historical Inquiry Skills within the initial stages, a Generic approach, followed by the contextualisation of those skills within the Inquiry into Ancient Egyptian life, place this unit within the Situated window of the GeSTE windows framework. Involving students in historical thinking pushes past the Generic window with activities like "Writing an imaginative letter to a friend adopting the persona of a person living in ancient Egypt" and the "Evaluation of theories related to the construction of the pyramids".
Students are required to interrogate and evaluate primary & secondary sources using ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘when’, ‘why’ questions set out in their textbook and Generic questions (see inset below) are given to guide students to draw conclusions about a usefulness of sources - that resemble the questions asked in the C.R.A.P. test.
Students are asked to:
![]() |
![]()
by nist6dh
|
- Write definitions of key words/concepts using the textbook (Remembering)
- Write a short explanation about how the climate affected the everyday life of Ancient Egyptians.. (Understand)
- Use information contained in a presentation to create a detailed diagram that highlights 'change and continuity' between each [Ancient Egyptian] Kingdom. (Apply)
- Compare and contrast images/phrases that define the characteristics of an ancient society against the characteristics that define a society today. (Analyse)
- Examine the different theories of how the Pyramids were constructed and evaluate the different theories. (Evaluate)
- Formulate their own inquiry question about an ancient civilisation (India, or China) then collate and organise information in order to answer the inquiry question. (Create)
Students are required to interrogate and evaluate primary & secondary sources using ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘when’, ‘why’ questions set out in their textbook and Generic questions (see inset below) are given to guide students to draw conclusions about a usefulness of sources - that resemble the questions asked in the C.R.A.P. test.
DRAWING CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE USEFULNESS OF SOURCESThe following are good questions to ask in order to determine the usefulness of a source: ☺ Is it a reliable source? ☺ Is there enough information and sufficient detail to help me answer the inquiry question? ☺ Does the information support and reinforce evidence from other sources? ☺ Is it balanced or does it present one point of view (bias)? ☺ Is it based on fact or opinion? ☺ Is the information current? |
![]() |
NSW DET Information process
|
![]() |
Screen shot of the Information Process used within the unit. Permission to use granted by authors. |
Recommendations for enhancing the unit
Year 7 History is such an extensive unit when looked at as a whole. Isolating each depth study would have brought up deficits in different areas. The fact that these units are not mutually exclusive and must be taught in sequence shows that a lot of thought was put into the progression of student abilities across the whole subject area.
In order to push this through into the Transformative window of the GeSTE framework, this unit could have gone on to look at the commonalities between the treatment of people in Ancient Societies and today's society and taken on a moral stance towards an issue effecting the world today. The line of questioning such as "What mistakes have been made in the past?", "What mistakes are we still making now?" and "What can we do to help stop or minimise the impact of these mistakes?" could help students reflect on their learning and push them to an activist role for human rights issues through the lens of the Ancient Societies, however this may be difficult.
2 comments:
Dear Emma,
I love the stunning look and layout of your blog (and your selection of the 1909 Lady Pirate image too). You have given clear thought to the importance of the interface design: clear navigation points, attractive images and typography, vibrant colour matching (especially the progression of Bloom’s Taxonomy section – great idea!).
In the world of blogs “Content is King” (Bill Gates, 1996 http://www.craigbailey.net/content-is-king-by-bill-gates/). You obviously are aware of this point, because you have created a highly informative piece for the reader in “Analysis of the Year 7 History unit against Theories and Concepts”. You have taken complex theories and provided the reader with a context to build a deeper understanding, as they read about the History Unit. This post builds on the clear description of the unit you provide in the previous post (Part 1).
The links to valuable sources support your explanations of the student’s guided and individual inquiries. I had not come across the pdf from the NSW DET regarding Information Skills Process (this resource will be helpful in my future work as a Teacher-Librarian, thank you for including this in your post). There is one link you may need to change (the GeST link to Mandy Lupton’s blog) because I think her blog is for QUT students only? Please check on this.
You mention that this is the final assignment to complete your Masters of Education – Teacher Librarianship. Congratulations for completing it in excellent ‘style’! I hope you feel extremely proud of this incredible achievement. Your important work as a TL, will help guide Australia’s future generation of highly inquisitive and creative minds. Your legacy work, in this blog, will serve to help other professionals as they engage in their own meta-inquiry journeys.
Best wishes.
Kind regards,
Tony Szymkowski.
Dear Emma,
Thank you for sharing your insight about this unit of work. Being a primary school teacher with the NSW DEC, it is great to see what happens next… Often we concentrate so much on the primary student and forget to think about the learning that occurs when they enter high school.
I agree with you that discussing the three units as a whole is a good approach. This shows the progression throughout the units and allows for a more holistic understanding of the teaching and learning that takes place. The inclusion of a structured inquiry to start allows teacher to gauge student’s inquiry skills and build those Generic skills before moving them into higher order thinking skills, which as teachers is helpful.
Your blog is easy to navigate and ensuring all the links open in a new tab is a simple but very effective feature as it allows the reader to easily navigate back to your blog whilst leaving open information they may want to delve deeper into at a later date.
The school History Inquiry graphic that lists the processes (similar to the NSW DEC ISP model)is a great resource for teachers as it provides, as you mention, a common language in an easily accessible format.
One question I have is: Does the questioning mentioned under Bloom’s Taxonomy build from Lower Order Thinking skills to Higher Order Thinking skills as the unit progresses from structured to a guided inquiry? I ask as I wonder if the questioning deliberately builds towards HOT skills or if they are just scattered through the unit as random tasks.
Congratulations on almost finishing your Masters.
Kirsty Fitzsimmons
Post a Comment
Need to add an image? Use this code [img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vMv-xNT7UIM/VEi3EdMMsTI/AAAAAAAAA20/mFBVIMqoQ6k/s200/Screen%2BShot%2B2014-10-23%2Bat%2B7.04.06%2BPM.png[/img]